55 Acres of Toxic Neglect in the Heart of Our City
For 16 years, the former General Motors plant on Ontario Street has sat crumbling, contaminated, and dangerous — while politicians looked the other way. Toxins up to 1,100 times above safe limits.[3] A filtration system that may not be running.[8] Children playing among the ruins.[7] It's time this ends.
How We Got Here
The former GM Powertrain plant, originally McKinnon Dash & Metal Works, operated on Ontario Street from 1901.[1] For nearly a century it employed tens of thousands and shaped the city's economy. But when the doors closed, what remained was a toxic legacy no one wanted to own.
GM Shuts Down Operations
After decades of declining production, the plant closes permanently,[16] leaving behind a century's worth of contamination. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that year identifies 12 areas of environmental concern.[3]
Phase II Assessment Finds Widespread Contamination
A Phase II assessment documents heavy metals, industrial chemicals, and PCBs across the site at levels far above provincial safety standards — in soils bordering homes, daycares, parks, and businesses.[1] These assessments are not shared with the public.[5]
Bayshore Groups Buys the Property for $12.5M
Ambitious plans are announced: retirement residences, apartments, commercial space, a trade school — a $250M mixed-use development.[2] The community celebrates.[4]
Promises Collapse
Bayshore strips the site of scrap metal and anything of value but fails to complete environmental work. Structures are demolished illegally without permits.[2] Photos emerge of then-Mayor Sendzik fishing in the Caribbean with Bayshore's Robert Megna.[2] By 2018 Bayshore has effectively abandoned the project.[6]
City Staff Sound Internal Alarm
Internal emails reveal a city bylaw manager urged provincial staff to visit the site, calling it a matter of "urgency" — noting pits contaminated with machine oil and PCBs possibly leaching into surrounding soil and water.[6] Residents were not informed for two more years.[6]
Coalition for a Better St. Catharines Forms
Frustrated residents organize, gathering over 2,000 petition signatures.[4] Susan Rosebrugh becomes a near-daily presence on Ontario Street with her handmade highlighter-green signs, sometimes protesting alone in winter.[6]
Province Confirms Cancer-Causing Chemicals
The MECP confirms PCBs and contaminants are present in storm sewers near the site after rain or snow events, exceeding Ontario water quality objectives.[6] Residents present to council — one calls the site "a public health emergency."[4] Council rezones the land for mixed-use residential development despite the contamination.[13]
Filtration System Installed
Peter's Environmental is hired to build and maintain a toxic runoff control system after the MECP identifies continuous PCB leaks and orders the property owner to install a system to capture and treat contaminated water.[9]
Two-Year FOI Battle
The Pointer files a Freedom of Information request in May 2022.[5] The City sides with GM, arguing residents might become "unduly alarmed" and cannot understand the data.[5] Ontario IPC Adjudicator Alec Fadel rules against them on November 12, 2024, finding none of the arguments persuasive, and orders full release.[5] The City's own webpage acknowledges the order.[14]
The Truth Comes Out
Released environmental assessments reveal contamination at 10 to 1,100 times provincial limits, including petroleum hydrocarbons, lead, PCBs, benzene, cobalt, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.[3] A former union health and safety rep who worked at the plant for 20 years says the documents are deeply upsetting.[12]
System Fails, Permits Revoked
Peter's Environmental files a $1.75M lien for unpaid work.[1] Demolition permits revoked for inactivity.[1] City admits it doesn't know if the filtration system works.[8] NDP MPPs Stevens and Burch write to Environment Minister McCarthy.[9][10] MECP refers the matter to its Enforcement Branch.[9] A November council motion requests information but orders no new testing, enforcement, or remediation.[15]
Transparency Failures Continue
FOI documents reveal the City and province knew the filtration system was offline by October 28, 2025 but failed to inform the public.[11] The MECP denies a request for inspection reports, citing an "ongoing investigation."[11] Site fencing collapses, briefly leaving the property fully open.[17] At a town hall, the mayor tells residents the ministry is "comfortable with the measures in place."[18]
Still Waiting
Council passes a non-binding motion asking the property owner to remove a catwalk by December 2026.[7] The mayor interrupts community advocate Gwen Kennedy during her council presentation.[7] Ownership records remain murky — a numbered company incorporated in September 2025 now corresponds with the City.[19] Coalition emails go unanswered.[19] The mayor uses strong-mayor powers to award a $250K single-source planning contract, bypassing competitive procurement.[20]
What's in the Ground
Environmental assessments completed in 2010 and 2012 revealed toxic substances at dangerous concentrations across the 55-acre site.[3] These chemicals are persistent and the assessments noted they may be migrating to adjacent residential areas via groundwater, surface water, or windblown dust.[3] No comprehensive updated assessment has been completed since.[12]
PCBs
Detected leaking into storm sewers and Twelve Mile Creek at up to 1,000× provincial safe water standards.[1] Provincial sampling in 2022 confirmed levels remained "still significantly higher" than guidelines.[10]
Benzene
Volatile organic compound associated with leukemia. Found exceeding provincial limits in site soil and groundwater.[3][15]
Lead
Causes irreversible neurological damage, especially in children. No safe level of exposure. Found above provincial standards across the site.[3]
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Widespread from a century of industrial use. Can contaminate drinking water and devastate Twelve Mile Creek ecosystems.[3]
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Potent carcinogens from incomplete combustion. Found throughout the site exceeding safe standards.[3]
A Hazard Hiding in Plain Sight
Beyond chemical contamination, the site poses physical dangers. Fencing has proven inadequate — even collapsing on at least one occasion, leaving the property fully open.[17]
Half-demolished buildings with open access. Exposed manholes and pits nearly invisible at night. An oil grit separator hatch left open outside the fencing.[7] Children and teenagers enter regularly. Unhoused residents shelter in the ruins — St. Catharines Fire Chief David Upper confirmed seven emergency calls to the site in 2024 alone.[7]
Residents report toxic-smelling dust, rat infestations, and plummeting property values. Neighbouring businesses have closed.[4] One nearby resident was diagnosed with a rare form of male breast cancer in 2021.[6] The City's building services director stated the former GM buildings are "exempt from enforcement of bylaws."[7]
A Pattern of Failure
This crisis results from cascading failures across every level — corporations, developers, politicians, and regulators.
General Motors
Operated the site for 80+ years. Fought a two-year legal battle to prevent environmental assessments from being released, arguing disclosure would cause "reputational harm."[5] The sale agreement required buyers to meet environmental requirements, but GM did little to ensure compliance.[6]
Bayshore Groups
Purchased for $12.5M with grand plans.[4] Stripped anything of value, demolished structures illegally, failed on environmental work, and abandoned the project by 2018.[2] Tax arrears ballooned to nearly $2.5M.[19]
Movengo / Celernus
Murky ownership — a numbered company incorporated Sept 2025 now appears in correspondence, linked to Celernus Investment Partners.[19] Coalition emails go unanswered.[19] Critical studies still incomplete.[2]
City of St. Catharines
Sided with GM to suppress reports.[5] Former mayor held private meetings with developers.[2] Admitted not knowing if filtration system works.[8] CAO stated they are "limited in abilities to force actions" despite provincial law saying otherwise.[7]
GM Profited for 80 Years. They Can't Just Walk Away.
General Motors operated this site from 1929 to 2010 — over 80 years of heavy industrial manufacturing that embedded the contamination now threatening this community. They sold the property in 2014 for $12.5 million[4] and then fought for two years to prevent the public from learning the true extent of what they left behind.[5]
But a property sale does not erase a pollution legacy. Ontario's environmental law is clear on this point.
The Ontario Environmental Protection Act is built on the "polluter pays" principle — one of the foundational principles of environmental law in Canada.[21] Under Sections 17 and 18 of the Act, the Ministry of Environment has broad powers to issue orders against those responsible for contamination — including past owners and operators, even if they no longer own the land.[22] The term "responsible person" under the Act explicitly includes current and former owners and operators of a contaminated site.[23]
Ontario's own framework states plainly that the original polluter and former property owners can be required to pay for cleanups, even if they no longer own the polluted land.[21] Where contamination has migrated off-site — as it has here, into Twelve Mile Creek and potentially into neighbouring properties[3] — the original polluter can face liability for remediation of the source property, neighbouring properties, prevention of further migration, and loss of property value.[22]
GM is a multinational corporation with annual revenues exceeding $170 billion. The community that powered their profits for nearly a century should not be left to absorb the cost of cleaning up what GM left behind. The provincial government has the legal tools to bring GM back to the table. They should use them.
Where pollution does occur, the polluter must pay to clean it up. The original polluter and former property owners can be required to pay for clean ups, even if they no longer own the polluted land.— Ontario Environmental Protection Act, foundational principles[21]
What Needs to Happen
Restore & Monitor the Filtration System
The runoff control system, deactivated in late 2023,[17] must be immediately inspected, restored, and placed under continuous independent monitoring with public reporting.
Hold GM Accountable for Remediation Costs
GM operated this site for over 80 years and created the contamination. Ontario's Environmental Protection Act allows the province to order former owners and operators to pay for cleanup, even after a sale.[21][22] The MECP should use its authority under Sections 17 and 18 of the Act to bring GM to the table and require them to contribute to the full cost of remediation. A $12.5M property sale does not erase 80 years of pollution.
Full Public Transparency
Ontario's FOI legislation states municipalities should share records revealing "a grave environmental, health or safety hazard to the public."[12] All reports and findings must be proactively shared.
Community Health Assessment
Multiple residents have reported health effects they believe are linked to the site.[7] A full public health study of Haig and Woodruffe should assess whether proximity has contributed to elevated health risks.
Write to Your Representatives
Copy the template below and send it to your councillors, MPP, and the Mayor. Personalize it with your own experience.
Template Letter
Who to Send It To
Coun. Caleb Ratzlaff
📧 cratzlaff@stcatharines.ca · 📞 905-327-0473
Coun. Robin McPherson
📧 rmcpherson@stcatharines.ca · 📞 905-328-0003
Mayor Mat Siscoe
📧 mayor@stcatharines.ca · 📞 905-688-5600 ext. 1540
City Hall, 50 Church St., St. Catharines, ON L2R 7C2
MPP Jennie Stevens (NDP)
📧 jstevens-co@ndp.on.ca · 📞 905-935-0018
Constituency Office: 209 Carlton St., Unit B, St. Catharines, ON L2R 1S1
MPP Stevens has already written to the Environment Minister about this site and is actively pressing for answers.
Premier Doug Ford
📧 premier@ontario.ca · 📞 416-325-1941
Online contact form: correspondence.premier.gov.on.ca
Legislative Building, Queen's Park, Toronto, ON M7A 1A1
Minister Todd McCarthy
📧 minister.mecp@ontario.ca · 📞 416-314-6790
The MECP is directly responsible for environmental enforcement at the former GM site. Minister McCarthy confirmed the matter was referred to the Enforcement Branch.
Join the Fight
The Coalition for a Better St. Catharines has been advocating for cleanup and accountability for over eight years.[7]
Sources
This site draws on investigative journalism, official government documents, community advocacy, provincial elected officials' correspondence, and syndicated local reporting. Sources are numbered as they appear in citations above.
- Demolition Permits Revoked in Latest Setback for Blighted PropertyThe Pointer — Oct 2025 · Investigative reporting
- Developer 'Not Prepared' to Pay for Critical StudiesThe Pointer — May 2024 · Investigative reporting
- 'A Monster Looming Behind Us': Contamination Documented at Former GM SiteThe Pointer — Dec 2024 · Based on released Phase I & II ESAs
- St. Catharines Residents Fed Up With GM SiteNiagara Independent — Jan 2020 · Local news
- St. Catharines, GM Lose Two-Year Battle to Keep Contamination Details SecretThe Pointer — Nov 2024 · Reporting on Ontario IPC Adjudicator Alec Fadel's order
- Former GM Plant in St. Catharines Is Leaking Toxic ChemicalsThe Narwhal — Oct 2022 · National environmental journalism
- Council Seeks Catwalk Removal — Refuses to Address Broader Safety ConcernsThe Pointer — Mar 2026 · Council reporting
- City Admits It Has No Clue If Toxic Safety System Is WorkingThe Pointer — Oct 2025 · Investigative reporting
- Environment Ministry Mulling Investigation Into Disconnected Filtration SystemThe Pointer — Nov 2025 · Includes MECP Minister response to MPPs
- Full Text: MPP Jennie Stevens' Letter to the Minister of EnvironmentNiagara At Large — Nov 2025 · Published MPP correspondence
- Filtration System Failure Kept From PublicVillage Report (Local Journalism Initiative) — Dec 2025 · Based on FOI-obtained MECP/City emails
- Investigation Finds Disturbing Contamination at Ex-GM Site Slated for HousingThorold News (Local Journalism Initiative) — Jan 2025
- Re-designation of Ontario Street Property ApprovedCity of St. Catharines — Nov 2021 · Official municipal press release
- Future of 282-285 Ontario Street — Status UpdatesCity of St. Catharines — Official municipal page (ongoing)
- Council Fails to Act on Toxic Former GM Site Despite Public OutcryThorold News (Local Journalism Initiative) — Nov 2025
- Could Tax Incentives Be Solution for Former GM Property?Global News — Oct 2020 · National news
- Updated Testing — But Site May Not Be 'Risk-Free'The Pointer — Jan 2026 · Includes MTE Consultants report
- Residents Slam City's Response to Derelict GM SiteVillage Report (Local Journalism Initiative) — Nov 2025 · Town hall reporting
- Records Reveal Murky Ownership After Years of Failed RehabilitationThe Pointer — Mar 2026 · Based on Ontario Land Registry documents
- Mayor's Single-Sourced Contract for Ontario Street Study Appears to Violate RulesTheRegional — Mar 2026 · Regional news
- What Is Environmental Law? — Ontario Environmental Protection Act & Polluter Pays PrincipleLegal Line (Canadian legal information) — Ontario environmental law overview
- The Polluter Does Not Always Pay: Environmental Liability of Property OwnersMcMillan LLP — Apr 2023 · Canadian law firm analysis of Ontario EPA liability
- Environmental Law: Responsible Persons Under Ontario's EPABlake, Cassels & Graydon LLP — Canadian law firm guide to environmental liability
Additional Resources
- Coalition for a Better St. Catharines — Official WebsiteCommunity advocacy organization
- Twelve Mile Creek: A Vector of ToxinsThe Pointer — Jan 2025
- Environment Ministry Downplayed Health Officials' Concerns — FOI RevealsThe Pointer — Mar 2025
- STONEWALLED: Officials Mislead Public After Protecting GM's ReputationPelhamToday (Local Journalism Initiative) — Jan 2025
- City Taking Hands-Off Approach to Dangers at Former GM SiteThe Pointer — Dec 2025
About This Site
This site was built by a concerned neighbour in the Haig neighbourhood. Every effort has been made to accurately present the facts of this situation based on publicly available reporting, official government documents, and published correspondence. However, this is a community advocacy project — not professional journalism or legal counsel.
If you spot an error, have additional information, or would like to suggest a correction, please reach out at cleanupontariostreet@proton.me. Getting this right matters.